Innovation Culture isn’t a program. it’s the by-product of a better system.
“Innovation culture” is one of the most overused phrases in corporate life—and one of the most misunderstood.
Many organizations treat culture as something you can install: a campaign, a set of values, a few workshops, maybe an incubator, and a poster or two. Strategos’ view is more challenging (and more useful): culture is not an input to innovation. It’s an output. It emerges when an organization repeatedly experiences that new behaviors work—and that leadership and the operating system will back those behaviors up.
That distinction matters because it changes what you do on Monday morning. Instead of asking, “How do we change our culture?” you ask:
- What outcomes do we need innovation to deliver?
- What behaviors would produce those outcomes?
- What systems, routines, and leadership actions will make those behaviors normal—rather than heroic?
This article pulls together core Strategos thinking on building innovation culture: practical, structured, and grounded in what we consistently see in real organizations, including the barriers that stop culture change before it starts.
Where (innovation) culture actually lives: the beliefs your system reinforces
Culture isn’t what you say you value; it’s what people learn through experience is safe and successful.
Over time, organizations internalize beliefs like:
- “Only finished answers get an audience.”
- “Don’t surface uncertainty until you’ve solved it.”
- “Cross-functional collaboration is optional and slows things down.”
- “Innovation is for the innovation team; the rest of us deliver the plan.”
These beliefs don’t develop in isolation. They are subtly learned through how the organization distributes resources, makes choices, and recognizes achievement.
A useful way to read your innovation culture is to look at four “proof points”:
1) Funding is a signal which activities are valued
If the only work that gets funded is late-stage innovation and near-certain business cases, people learn that uncertainty is career risk. If a portion of resources is earmarked for discovery and early experimentation, people understand that learning is valuable—not just execution. (And importantly: the goal isn’t spending more. It’s spending with a logic that matches innovation’s uncertainty profile.)
2) Promotion criteria reveal the real strategy
If advancement goes to operators who shy away from risk and never fail, innovation becomes “extra credit” at best and risky behavior at worst. If leaders are recognized for building new options, mobilizing coalitions, and learning their way through ambiguity, the culture shifts because people can see a career path that includes innovation.
3) What leaders praise publicly and punish quietly becomes the code
Organizations often say they want bold thinking, but teams watch what happens when widely shared assumptions about the business are challenged, when customer insights contradict the internal narrative, or when a project needs to pivot. When leaders reward candor and course correction, you achieve learning velocity. When they reward certainty exclusively, you get risk avoidance.
4) Decision-making under uncertainty exposes the operating logic
In mature businesses, governance is designed for control, efficiency, and predictability. In innovation, governance must be crafted to reduce uncertainty over time. When uncertainty causes delays and escalations, innovation stalls. Conversely, if uncertainty leads to experiments, customer contact, and disciplined learning cycles, innovation accelerates—and the innovation culture begins to trust the process.
Bottom line: culture forms when people repeatedly observe what the system truly rewards and reinforces the behaviors that support it.
The question most companies skip: “Innovation culture… to achieve what?”
A culture of innovation is not a destination. It’s a capability that should serve specific strategic outcomes. When companies say “we need an innovation culture,” our response is “to achieve what?” Because if you don’t define the kind of success you want from innovation, you can’t define the behaviors or support systems that will create it.
A practical “innovation ambition” should clarify:
1) What type of innovation matters most right now?
The cultural requirements for broad-based incremental innovation are not the same as those for a few enterprise-level growth platforms. One can be supported by widespread participation and local experimentation; the other often requires deeper sensing, concept development skills, and more concentrated effort.
2) What strategic outcomes should innovation enable?
Innovation needs to contribute to strategic goals: defend the core, expand into adjacencies, reinvent the business model, improve customer experience, reduce cost-to-serve, unlock new growth engines. Without clarity, innovation becomes either scattered ideation or a set of disconnected pilots with no coherent pathway to growth and success.
3) What time horizons are you managing in your innovation portfolio?
An innovation culture collapses when everything is forced into one horizon (usually “this year”). A healthier system acknowledges multiple horizons and manages them differently so teams aren’t punished for uncertainty in the early stages.
4) What will count as progress before the money shows up?
If the only success measure is “launched and profitable,” you will kill exploration of ideas that don’t immediately fit the core business early. If you define progress as validated assumptions, customer evidence, and learning milestones, people can advance more rapidly and reduce uncertainty before committing resources to scale.
Strategos’ “Innovation Ambition” framing captures this explicitly by defining what the organization wants to become and the principles it will live by as an innovative company.
Don’t install “innovation culture.” Build the system that makes innovation normal.
Innovation culture is achieved by doing innovation, not by talking about it.
But “doing innovation” doesn’t mean just brainstorming ideas, starting a company-wide innovation campaign, or organizing hackathons. It means building an operating system in which innovation becomes a repeatable discipline supported by capability, opportunity, reinforcement, and leadership behavior.
1) Capability: people need shared skills, not just enthusiasm
Innovation can be learned.
The practical skills matter: challenging orthodoxies, developing new perspectives, getting to real customer insight, creating and shaping concepts, designing experiments, and making decisions with evidence rather than opinion.
The act of “doing innovation” also serves a culturally important purpose: it creates a common language. When teams share vocabulary for assumptions, experiments, learning, and customer insights, innovation stops being mystical and becomes manageable.
2) Opportunity: people need real work to apply the skills
A common failure mode: “We trained everyone, why didn’t culture change?”
Because training without application is theatre. Organizations often run training but don’t create opportunities for people to apply new skills to meaningful opportunities so innovation doesn’t stick and is easily forgotten.
Culture shifts when employees practice new behaviors during real strategic challenges where the work matters, learning is visible, and leaders pay attention because the outcomes directly support the company’s goals.
3) Reinforcement: the management system must reward the right behaviors
An innovation culture cannot survive if the operating system rewards only predictability and efficiency.
Reinforcement includes resource allocation, performance management, incentives, recognition, metrics, and governance routines. We emphasize that the foundational building blocks include training, engagement, communication, and metrics not as “nice-to-haves,” but as the scaffolding for a durable capability.
Leadership behavior: leaders must model the future, not the past
Leaders don’t need to become the “chief innovator.”
They do need to change how they lead in the face of uncertainty: asking more than telling, sponsoring learning-based experimentation, making it safe to surface truths early, and protecting cross-functional work when delivery pressure rises.
Achieve an innovation culture through a step-wise approach that scales
Our approach to achieving an innovation culture is clear: you need to work on multiple fronts, but you don’t need to do everything at once. You need a roadmap that links initiatives so they reinforce the bigger picture.
Here’s our view on the integrated pathway in a stepwise fashion:
1) Define the innovation ambition and the “rules of the game”
This is where innovation becomes specific: what it will contribute strategically, what kinds of initiatives you want more of, and what will count as progress.
In our innovation maturity model, we outline elements commonly found in organizations with a strong innovation culture: a clear innovation strategy, a proven process for advancing ideas, broad engagement, support mechanisms (tools, champions, training), systematic learning capture, and linkage to performance management.
This step also challenges a common myth that innovation is best served by unleashing creativity without constraints. People need clear aiming points on what the organization is trying to achieve and why to prevent a common trap: “absolute freedom is paralyzing.”
2) Diagnose current reality by listening to success and frustration
A serious culture diagnostic isn’t a survey exercise. It’s an exercise in honesty and openness if you want real insights that can be acted on.
We recommend interviewing people who have succeeded with innovation and those who have given up in frustration, asking: What innovations did we miss and why? What succeeded and why? What are the most frustrating barriers innovators face today?
Surfacing barriers and enablers is important because more often than not they are cultural and not simply a lack of tools, processes or funding.
A culture diagnostic is part of our broader Innovation Assessment.
3) Design and test the future through pilots
Pilots shouldn’t just prove an idea; they should prove a way of working.
Trying to work on culture in isolation, divorced from tangible work on real opportunities and temporary support systems, doesn’t work. You need to proceed in parallel. Run real opportunities while putting in place “temporary management systems” (seed funds, boards, decision forums) and actively reinforcing the behaviors you want.
This is how belief changes: teams experience that the new way of working can produce progress, and leaders experience that uncertainty can be managed rather than ignored.
4) Implement and embed through sequencing, linkages, and reinforcement
Culture change fails when everything launches everywhere at once.
Choose the most critical barriers and address them first, building capability and system elements in a step-wise plan.
Embedding then becomes a sequence:
- institutionalize what worked in pilots into governance and metrics,
- expand participation,
- tighten the pathway from ideas to impact,
- and steadily align incentives and performance management so innovation is not “despite the system,” but because of it.
What “good” starts to look like after 12–18 months
When innovation culture is real, you’ll see it in everyday behaviors:
- Teams use shared language for assumptions, experiments, and learning, not just ideas, concepts and business cases.
- Leaders ask for evidence and learning progress, not certainty of commercial success.
- There is a functioning pathway from ideas to impact through resources, governance, and support, so participation grows rather than burns out.
- Collaboration increases because it’s designed into the work, not left to goodwill and informal networks.
- The organization is measurably building capability (skills, participation, progress indicators), not just running activities.
Most importantly, people stop talking about “innovation culture” as a separate thing. It becomes part of how the company solves problems, finds growth, and renews itself.
The executive takeaway
If you want an innovation culture, don’t start by trying to change culture. The hard truth about achieving an innovation culture is that it requires tough choices, a systematic approach, and above all, transparency and openness about “how we do things around here”.
Start by building the innovation system that changes what’s rational for people to do:
- Aim innovation with a clear ambition tied to strategy.
- Diagnose reality through honest interviews and evidence of what blocks innovators today.
- Pilot the future to build belief through real progress—and learn what must change in the system.
- Embed through reinforcement: metrics, resourcing, governance, leadership behaviors, and performance alignment.
Innovation Culture follows because the organization accumulates proof that the new way of working succeeds, delivers the desired outcomes and helps an organization achieve its vision for the future.
Ready to see this in action?
See how an Innovation Assessment can work in your organisation
No obligation. Just a focused conversation about what’s possible for your organisation.
